Reviewed: 2007-07-25
Male Wank
gaydemon > reviews > Male Wank
| Site Score: 39 out of 100 | Videos: | 8 / 20 | Tour Claims: | 3 / 5 | Find out more about ratings, read the score criteria. |
| Pictures: | 6 / 10 | Uniqueness: | 11 / 15 | ||
| Content Amount: | 4 / 20 | Usability | 2 / 5 | ||
| Updates: | 0 / 15 | Value: | 5 / 10 |
See the site for yourself, click here to visit Male Wank!
No Updates!
This site has stopped updating and have no recent or new content.
Videos
33 vids, downloadable WMV clips and streaming Real Player full scenes, vids shown at 320x240, bitrate of about 348k, amateur quality, good sound
Pictures
33 pic sets corresponding with the videos, size approx 535x800, good amateur quality, downloadable and you can choose which pics go in the zip file
Issues
Site no longer updates.
Membership Cost
Credit Card processing and billing by DHD Media.
- Monthly: $12.95 (recurring every 30 days)
Male Wank is a small site, containing only about 20 models, some with multiple shots. The contents are interesting and the site clearly has potential, making it a shame that Male Wank hasn't been updated since 2003 (!). That said, it's good fun for a small price.
Male Wank is primarily a solo site that also contains a small number of action videos. As the site features neither muscle hunks nor porn stars, the guys on Male Wank are sexy in an ordinary, next-door, kind of way. Their solo acts go beyond the usual laying naked on a bed, watching a porn-flick impassively while jerking off, involving posing, flexing, stripping, and the occasional use of a flashlight or other toys. My favourite guy on the site is Paolo, a hunky, masculine stud with a well-built, hairy, body, who uses a penis pump before shooting his load.
Let's take a closer look at Male Wank: Once inside, you're on the main page, with four pages of models. When I tried to go to the 'model' link on the top of the page, I'm redirected to the parent site, called kinky.com. Via a drop-down menu, I then have to select the website whose model(s) I wish to see. Upon selecting Male Wank, I got several pages of models, some of which don't appear on Male Wank's main page, the one that opens when entering the site. Upon clicking on some of the models, I was asked for a password. As using my Male Wank password didn't work, I realised that these models are actually part of the network's other sites, such as buttmachineboys. I figured out eventually, that in order to get to Male Wank's main model page I have to go to 'updates', which basically is identical with the page that opens when entering the site! Clearly, there are some serious navigation issues here
On the first page, there are 9 models, some with 3, some with 9 pics taken from the shoot. Below the model's name and the date of the shoot, you get the option to choose between 'pictures', 'video clips', and 'streaming'. To view the full-length film, you have to click on 'streaming'. All streaming videos play with Real Player, while the individual clips play either with Real or WMV, depending on the model. The videos have sound, are decent in size, and are of good amateur quality. What's more, all clips are downloadable.
As for the pics, there are between 57 and 150 pics per model. Upon clicking on 'pictures' of a particular model, you get the option to choose between high and low resolution. After selecting the resolution, all pics open in a new page. The quality of the pics is good, the size is reasonable, and, like the clips, you have the choice to toggle those pics you want to download, which comes in handy as there is no slide-show option on the site.
While navigation is confusing, the site design below par, and the size of the site small, the contents of Male Wank are interesting and the site clearly has potential, making it a shame that the site has neither been spruced up nor updated since 2003. That said, on the plus side is the small price of Male Wank, so why not check it out?
Things we liked:
- Exclusive content
- Good sound
- Good amateur type models
- Pics and WMV clips easy to download
Things we didn't like:
- Site does not update
- Streaming vids do not work in Firefox
- Playback isn't perfectly smooth
Martin | 03 Apr 2008 | My rating:
mouthymarvin | 19 Sep 2007 | My rating:
Add your own comment »