Vncntdl | 23 Aug 2010 | My rating:

This used to be a good, sometimes awesome, site. (JR, in particular, was a fantastic stud: a rock musician who discovered he liked getting fucked.) But as others have noted, and I will repeat, this site has not posted any new material in years. If you haven't been to the site before it might be worth it to join, but everyone else should keep their distance. It should not be given a 7 rating when it has not updated in years, even if the quality of what they have is good. Every year they have not updated (2 years? 3 years?) they should automatically have a point deducted by the Gay Demon reviewers.

lambda | 03 Aug 2010 | My rating:

DRM is indeed gone but the content is the same recycled videos but without the DRM. Another old video is added again once a week or so. If you have been a member before like myself, there has not been an update in years. There is no sign that Mike Hancock even owns a video camera anymore.

Daniel | 29 Oct 2009 | My rating:

Yes indeed...the DRM is gone :-)

cloud | 26 Oct 2009 | My rating:

It says on the website now that it doesn'y use DRM anymore. Does anyone know if the vids are fully downloadable now?

Abe | 04 Sep 2009 | My rating:

I caution anyone who used to subscribe to mikehancock.com and is thinking about subscribing again. It has completely changed, and they have taken down all of the old videos, they are nowhere to be found. And they have replaced them with ONLY scenes of Mike Hancock doing audition scenes where he sucks a guy's cock, or fucks a guy while he is fully clothed. EEEEWWWWWW!

There is nothing LESS erotic than seeing an overweight, fortunately fully clothed middle-aged man with his penis sticking out his zipper then fuck a naked stud on the edge of the bed. The oral scenes are no better, he literally sucks the model's cock and then the scene ends. The audition scenes are always as boring too, I don't think anyone actually watches boring jack off scenes unless it's to check out the new dude on a site so you can decide if you want to download his future scenes later.

I emailed customer service complaining, and demanded my money back the same day as I subscribed because I was missing some of my favorite older scenes featuring Kody Henshaw, Francis Walnut, Ryan etc. Boy was I in for a surprise when I joined, and found nothing but scene after scene of ugly fat Mike Hancock sucking a guy's dick, or fucking a guy while he remains fully clothed. There are NO longer any action scenes, except for the ones where Mike Hancock fucks someone fully clothed. They gave me a full refund, and explained that they had changed the site's content to only include scenes that Mike Hancock himself participated in. EEWW!

I'm warning you, don't join MikeHancock.com because you'll likely be very disappointed. It used to be a pretty good site, but now it really sucks.

lloyd | 07 Aug 2009 | My rating:

Back in the day, I used to be a regular subscriber to Mike Hancock. But, the site has turned into something I hardly recognize. I think "Mr. Hancock" has gotten greedy and has opted for a Jake Cruise-esque way of doing his sites by creating two seperate sites and trying to unload old videos on the "newer" site. The Club Hancock site is hardly ever updated, and when it is, it's mostly straight oriented, or old videos from his old Mike Hancock site that he got rid of. Geesh, I liked the old site better and will not subscribe again to a site where "Mike" is clothed with his dick hanging outside of his pants and he fucks some guy at the edge of a bed. BORING!!!!!!!!!

hus | 04 Aug 2009 | My rating:

hell No to DRM!--which WON'T ALLOW YOU TO KEEP THE VIDS BY SAVING.. IT'S RENTAL FOR A TIME of subscription FOR VIEWING. IS THAT WORK THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR MONTHS AFTER MONTHS?? NO.

Plus very few great scenes.

Matt | 15 Mar 2009 | My rating:

Where are the hardcore videos? I can't find any of the ones I liked in the past like the ones featuring Gary. It seems most of them were taken down when the website changed its look. I've emailed customer service multiple times but never got a response.

Arnold Page | 09 Mar 2009 | My rating:

I wish I'd listened to the guy that wrote about downloaded pictures jamming your printer and the only way to get out is to click off the computer. All his photographs have a huge watermark that causes that, I guess. It's really nutty for a site to cause a computer to freeze, but his does.

Carter5 | 06 Jan 2009 | My rating:

Pictures are blurred with huge watermark, and if you still save any and want to print out, your color printer will freeze! Yes, really, the guy has some sort of gadget on his photos that makes the printer just stop, and the only way to get out of the mess is to click off the whole computer. This is really shitty stuff, in addition to DRM. Stay away!

Angry Customer | 07 Aug 2008 | My rating:

The site main page says that it is MAC friendly. IT IS NOT. I wrote to the customer service and they wrote me back to download FLIP4MAC. Hello DRM systems is not supported by that program. I asked for the explanation and they just ignored me. It really makes me mad. I hope this website will not last long until they respect their customers. I would have let it go if they apologized but they simply ignored my request for explanation. How can we stop to this? This is the second time this online website did the same kind of thing. Once they get paid they simply ignore you.

CJSole | 31 Dec 2007 | My rating:

I was disappointed at the content quality. The men are hot, don't get me wrong - I'm speaking more of the technical aspect. I'm a mac user and much of the content isn't still available. I'll wait until the full library is available. Then, it might be worth the price.

vncntdl | 17 Sep 2007 | My rating:

I joined the website when it became MAC-friendly. About 1/3 of the previous updates are now available for viewing/downloading on Quicktime (so no DRM). Unfortunetely, many months later, there has been no attempt to update the other 2/3 of archive material.
Worse, the website only updates once a week. Now, if you are going to only update so few times then they need to be awesome blow-out updates, and lately there has been one dud update after another. If you are going to show the same "amateurs" week in and week out then they better be up to some new tricks and not the same old thing.
Somewhere between 2 and 3 stars.

Harry | 10 Sep 2007 | My rating:

I liked the background info too