Landen | 07 Sep 2011 | My rating:

Boring. Models are relatively cute but have no chemistry. Don't bother with this site.

Nubian King | 26 Dec 2010 | My rating:

I totally agree with John. I am very disappointed with the site's actors! All of the actors need help. Its really sad and depressing to watch them. I feel like I should email the director with a list of drug rehab centers. The straight interracial sites make it look sexy and fun-this site is just plain dull and drags on doing the same ole scenes. Its a waste.

Corbey | 26 Aug 2010 | My rating:

Not a bad site, except that they want to focus on the white boys, while the black me are just accessories. Not what I was looking for. I also don't like the camera man talking all the time.

hurley carpenter | 29 Mar 2010 | My rating:

Some hot content. I actually think the camera man's comments are part what makes some episodes worth seeing. However, they have started the shady practice of posting old videos as recent updates.

Jon | 15 Aug 2009 | My rating:

The director needs to keep his mouth shut. They need to start finding real gay men rather than drug addicts and street people who couldn't be any less interested to be on video.

Why is gay black top on white bottom porn such bad quality? Take a page from straight black dick on white chick sites - they KNOW who they are, the guys and the girls are known by name and they've been around for a long time.

I have yet to see ONE gay site that actually delivers what I want to see - the equivalent of that. Not a site that then shows the black guy getting fucked, or shows another limp dicked bam type character who, since he isn't gay, can't get hard enough to do the job; we deserve much better for these prices we are expected to cough up. There is no WAY I am paying the same price as a monthly gym membership to support these directors who need to get a different job and models who should stick to living on skid row homeless shelters and soup kitchens in LA rather than entering any studio in SFV.

The fact that they're moving to bareback only proves that these are desperate people who are looking to score quick drug money rather than performers who love to have sex in front of the camera.

Addison Viets | 13 Apr 2009 | My rating:

I joined this site after seeing many previews that I really enjoyed, two specifically. Unfortunately after I joined, when I looked for those two specific scenes, they were not there! Mike Hart and Sebastian Ford were the two scenes I was looking for, and pretty much the only reason I purchased the membership. The scenes are still promised when viewing the previews, but when you log it they are not there. I am extremely irritated and pissed about this. Other than that though, there are many good videos. The only thing is, when the guys getting fucked aren't hard, it doesn't do it for me. :)

John | 04 Jan 2008 | My rating:

This site isn't bad, but it isn't good either. The problem I find with it was already mentioned by another reviewer, and it still holds true. Good porn is supposed to be hot, and the whole point of it is to get the surfer really horny. Before the models even get in front of the camera, they should already have been cued about what to do to make that happen. Once the camera starts rolling, the only things the surfer wants to see and hear is the hot action between the guys. Once the director and camera operators begin to put themselves into the scenes it kinda ruins the fantasy; and this seems to occur in far too many of the videos on this site.

Director interference works on the amateur sites for obvious reasons: most of the models are very young and have little or no experience, and it is their youthfullness and lack of experience that makes it interesting for the director to talk to them about themselves on camera and encourage them to try things they haven't done before. Blacks on Boys doesn't fit into the amateur prettyboy genre and it doesn't work here.

Grant | 20 Nov 2007 | My rating:

It's all a matter of preference I guess, but, in my humble opinion, good porn should involve the viewer and the performers ONLY. Although much of the action in the Blacks On Boys videos is visually hot, the ongoing vocal interaction between the models and the director/cameraman, especially in the latter videos, throws a bucket of cold water on that heat. Good grief, in those more recent videos, the guy behind the camera never seems to shut up, and I found his ongoing, often racially tainted chatter with the guys more than a bit annoying and off-putting.

I subscribed to this hardly inexpensive site to watch AND hear guys going at it, not to listen to some unseen dude blathering away in the background. Simply put, HIS opinions about the guys, their cocks, their butts, and how great the action is mean zilch to me. Afterall, I do have my own eyes and ears.

Todd | 04 Jun 2007 | My rating:

I've joined a few interracial sites, and usually end up disappointed but not with Blacks on Boys! These are some hot videos with their own flavor. They're also good quality. The black guys mostly have huge dicks and the sex is hot, so be sure to have some kleenex or a towel handy. I also appreciate that this site is large, with plenty of gay interracial action. Great job, Blacks on Boys.

Trev | 18 Mar 2007 | My rating:

This is by far the best interracial site! Its run and made by the same guys who run Blacksonblondes (dogfart) and if you seen that site you know exactly how good they are.

They seem to find the right black guys - big, muscly and well hung. The white guys they feature could be a bit younger and cuter but once you get into the action it doesnt matter what they look like - if you are anything like me - you are concentrating on the fat black cocks sliding into those white asses instead of their faces.