Reno Gulch | 04 Jan 2012 | My rating:

I've signed up for CF three times now, always to load up on downloadable clips of my favorite guys. They ran a Holiday Special, too, that gave me a month of both sites for $39. A fair deal, I think. I'll cancel and see what the new crop of scenes looks like in coming months.

New model KENT is stunning. Just my cup o' tea. ZEB is an adorable brunet who did one scene with a girl and now is back doing boy-on-boy. Very nice. Other new guys keep being introduced, most fade away. I often find the bi scenes to be just excellent on the ACS side, especially when both guys fuck the girl and then each other. Some new girls in the scenes, too -- Olivia is cute and sassy with the boys.

Yeah, some of the guys have been around and must be well into advanced graduate degrees at CF university, but they're good looking and great performers. Travis, formerly a skinny uber-bottom has been mainly topping lately. Delightful.

I really prefer action video to still shots, but the photographic quality of CF stills is just superb. They don't quite match that in their live scenes. Often too dark to see penetration, and unnecessary cuts to face shots, elbows, feet. I'm usually happiest when the camera shows a nice medium shot with both guys from knees up, nicely lit, not lots of cuts. They also too frequently have strongly backlit scenes against a window or a sunny pool deck -- makes for murky images in the foreground (seems like Bel Ami is the only outfit that knows how to make those shots work.

My dream site would be a merger of Corbin Fisher and College Dudes 24/7, letting the CD247 guys direct and photograph and letting the CG still photography team do the stills.

John | 25 Sep 2011 | My rating:

The following features make this site possibly unique in gay porn:

* There is quite a lot of barebacking, but it isn't advertised or promoted.

* Many scenes are mixed; fucking starts clearly bare then a condom appears or is conspicuously put on.

* Condom rings are often used to make it appear a condom is being worn when it isn't.

I don't like all the guys featured (same as any other site I've ever used), but I like enough of them to keep coming back. It's good that they offer 3 month non-recurring memberships. I've had several. Some the guys are definitely beyond college age, but that doesn't stop me liking them.

Fortunately they seem to have abandoned the CF Unlimited crap of earlier this year.

The site design is attractive and well organized. I really appreciate the fact that you can select a model's name and get an up-to-date list of every scene he's been in. I just wish other sites would follow this lead.

The direction and sexual choreography could be more imaginative. And I'd like to see more butt-hole shots. I think that in every scene, viewers should be treated to at least a glimpse of all the performers' holes. It is porn, after all. No point in being shy.

jesse h | 03 Jul 2011 | My rating:

This site is pretty good. One of the better ones out there. I just have a couple of minor complaints. One being that they need to get different models. I think its funny how they promote their site as 'college men' even though there are guys who look way too old for college. Like Travis. I mean he's hot but he must be like 28 by now lol, which is fine but when the site says they have college aged guys, they should give you college aged guys.


Next being that it can get really boring. The show the same type of sex over and over and although its a large site, they just do the same scenes over and over.

Ken | 28 May 2011 | My rating:

I have been a member of this website off and on for 6 years and watched it become slicker and slicker. Eventually it will become so slick that it will go the way of the phone it in terrible Falcon Studios as gone. Wooden performances, trying to art it up by changing scenery instead of focusing on what porn really is - hot guys who have chemistry having hot sex on a bed. You don't have to dress them up in silly hats (JetSet) or poise them in a sling (falcon) or contrive some silly story line (jocks) to get me going. CF I think jumped the shark when they rolled out "Unlimited" and started to get all creative. CF needs to go back to their glory days, hire people that aren't bored of what they are doing and trying new stuff just to keep them interested (Pete and Dawson). Its about the gay customer. Now having said that I still think CF is probably #2 or #3 gay website out there. I just don't want them to make the mistake other porn production companies make over time.

Richard | 05 May 2011 | My rating:

I have been a long time member of CF and have watched it grow in production quality. I agree some of the models are getting long in the tooth so to speak. But CF now seems to be changing some they are filming in Las Vegas and some of the new models are looking very good. A previous review mentioned Connor and Dawson bottoming. Both of them did in recent videos.

Dan | 12 Feb 2011 | My rating:

I'm waiting for them to get rid of dawson and lucas who have been on the site for like 10 years. I can't believe they're still passing these two middle aged guys off as college age dudes and I got sick of both of them years ago. once dawson and lucas are retired from the site i will rejoin as long as they lower the prices. but right now it costs around $50.00 ***PER MONTH*** to subscribe to both ACM and acs! What a ripoff.

ex member | 11 Jan 2011 | My rating:

Dawson and Connor are used way way way too much. It wouldn't be so bad if they actually ever bottomed. Josh, Travis, and Trey are good examples of who they should be using. All 3 are hot and they are more than willing to bottom and top. From some of the more recent additions, they might not be getting a lot of people to apply to their site to be actors. And then they raise their rates. Maybe they are paying Dawson and Connor way too much.

Michael | 14 Oct 2010 | My rating:

Their is a download limit! That really sucks as you pay almost $40 a month, and the their sister site which charges you sepretaly, is linked to the main one, so the download limit is shared, so dissapointing!

chris | 11 Oct 2010 | My rating:

this is an awesome site. the guys are hot and very natural. No DRM! worth the money to get a membership.

colin | 30 Sep 2010 | My rating:

this site is excellant the best ive seen so far

ial | 26 Sep 2010 | My rating:

Note: Download limit capped at 5GB per 24 hours.

lloyd | 14 Sep 2010 | My rating:

I wrote a letter to Corbin Fisher years ago requesting to see more people of color on the site. After Dante, there really hasn't been anyone. Sure, some people aren't attracted to it, fine, but if enough people request people of color they should make more of a concerted effort to include that. Why should I be left to subscibing to an "all-black" or "all-latino" site if I want to see those types of models. In 2010, it wouldn't hurt to integrate things a bit more.

ivan | 07 Sep 2010 | My rating:

Derek on Corbin Fisher is the best EVER !

Thanks John

J | 06 Aug 2010 | My rating:

When I was into hot cookie cutter guys this was the place to be. After awhile though I got bored with the same guys over and over again. Plus my porn tastes have changed and I tend to go for something a bit more raunchy. Corbin needs to change it up to get my business again.

BB | 29 Jul 2010 | My rating:

July 29, 2010
Corbin used to care what his members wanted/didn't want to see by taking our suggestions to heart, but he doesn't give a damn anymore by the following facts.

1) He bumped the price from $24 to $34 in one move. Usually people don't go more than a $5 raise.


2) He obviously, against people's will, retreads the same OLD faces/bodies of Lucas and Dawson. Corbin, dude, no one wants to see Lucas and his crooked teeth and red necked looking features. It looks like he doesn't shower, doesn't brush his teeth and he just comes off as creapy. Dawson has a nice body, yes...but Christ dude, you get sick of everyone after their pushed on you so often.


3) Since when did using pink rubbers and shaving pubes become part of a masculine guys web site?


4) Doing the same routine in every video gets really old as well.


I don't work for any web site and have never gotten one for free, but I really think chaosmen.com is the best site for frequent videos, price and variety of action of any site. For 24 bucks, you get three videos a week, they mix up the actors, the scenes, the dudes have body hair and they even do bb scenes which is very hot to watch.

Corbinfisher is still much better than militaryclassified.com, which is my opinion is the worst site that had the capability of being great. That old, ugly, out of shape Rob Navarro hasn't realized no one wants to see/hear his old ass in videos with hot younger guys. He is ugly, has a horrible body and is a horrible bottom. Not only that, but does his arrogant ass really think people pay to see him take over a scene with a hot, younger guy? He updates just once a week, has to break it into two scenes of about six minutes each and the great majority of the guys sit there like robots and don't make a noise...yeah, Rob, that's really hot when someone just sits there like they're in a coma while you slurp on their cocks and make moves/lunges like you have downsyndrome.